Thursday, April 22, 2010

the repair window is blocking the updater window

The repair window is blocking the updater window. But the repair window isn’t responding to clicks. I can’t focus it and it doesn’t appear in Exposé. It isn’t even raised when I click the Updater icon in the Dock.

I’ve tried this several times, always with the same result. I end up deleting Adobe Reader in frustration.

Until I need it back again because Marketing sends me AI files. (Yes, I know Preview can open them; no, it doesn’t do a passable job.)

The icing on the cake is that it’s not possible to download the latest version of Adobe Reader from their web site. It’s not posted anywhere. You have to get an installer that’s several versions old, and then use their updater to get the latest (which contains ‘important security updates’). I guess it’s too much work for them to update the download link when they make a new build?

Ancillary Point 1: No, I do not wish to have an Adobe plugin ruining Safari’s perfectly capable built-in PDF rendering. No sane person who understands what this means would ever choose this. Good thing it’s selected by default and surrounded by lots of scary ‘repair’ language. Which leads me to…

Ancillary Point 2: If I never installed the plugin in the first place, how can you ‘repair’ it? If it’s an optional component, why does it ‘require’ repair? Does anyone at Adobe read what they are typing?

Monday, March 8, 2010

What does Google think you're interested in?

What does Google think you’re interested in?

You may not have realised they are collecting this data about you, and drawing conclusions based on it. They don’t exactly go out of their way to let you know about the existence of this page.

Saturday, January 23, 2010

Bravo to Mozilla for their courageous stance that only third-party plugins using nonstandard APIs should be able to play YouTube videos.

Bravo to Mozilla for their courageous stance that only third-party plugins using nonstandard APIs should be able to play YouTube videos.

Mark Pilgrim, author of Dive Into HTML5

Thursday, January 21, 2010

Facebook employee talks about what goes on with your data

Facebook employee talks about what goes on with your data

Much of this should not be news to anyone, but still interesting to see someone talk candidly:

The Rumpus: On your servers, do you save everything ever entered into Facebook at any time, whether or not it’s been deleted, untagged, and so forth?

Facebook Employee: That is essentially correct at this moment.

Rumpus: You said they’re changing the policy of keeping all information.

Employee** :** No. They’re never changing that policy.

Employee: See, the thing is — and I don’t know how much you know about it — it’s all stored in a database on the backend. Literally everything. Your messages are stored in a database, whether deleted or not. So we can just query the database, and easily look at it without every logging into your account. That’s what most people don’t understand.

I can attest to that personally. When I first signed up for Facebook in 2005, when it was Thefacebook and the ‘wall’ was more like a wiki - but more to the point, when the site was much more closely-knit and less scary - I used a rather private AIM screen name that I usually only gave out to a select few people. I quickly realised this was a bad idea and changed it.

Three years later, an acquaintance was able to search for that screen name, and found my profile in order to ‘friend’ me. Now, this screen name wasn’t just hidden or anything - I had completely deleted it three years ago, as in, selected the text in the box, typed over it, and saved. There was no trace of it left in the user interface.

Now, the idea of ‘deleting’ something in the UI not actually being permanent is not new. I do this occasionally in the software I’m responsible for maintaining, in cases when we are dealing with financial transactions and a permanent audit trail must exist.

But the sticking point here is not whether they really need to keep something I’ve explicitly asked them not to; but that they were actually still making use of that data in a way that publicly affected me. I’m not sure what concerns me more: that it might have been intentional, or that it might have been a bug.

Which would be worse: that they’re using sensitive data maliciously, or incompetently? What other ‘deleted’ data might they be using in this way, whether they intend to or not?

Since then, I’ve been even more careful what I type, and of course, what I click:

Facebook Employee: … When you make any sort of interaction on Facebook — upload a photo, click on somebody’s profile, update your status, change your profile information —

Rumpus: When you say “click on somebody’s profile,” you mean you save our viewing history?

Employee: That’s right. How do you think we know who your best friends are?

Anyway, whoever this person is, they don’t sound like a very good engineer:

PHP is an example of a scripted language. The computer or browser reads the program like a script, from top to bottom, and executes it in that order: anything you declare at the bottom cannot be referenced at the top.

That is, of course, completely wrong.

Oh, and this is amusing:

When I arrived, a security guard handed me a non-disclosure contract to fill out, a requirement to enter the building. “Just making sure you’re not a Twitter spy,” he said.

Facebook seems even more paranoid about Twitter than Microsoft is about Apple and Linux combined. But really, what would Facebook possibly have that Twitter would even be interested in?

Saturday, January 9, 2010

Good to have the perspective of a friend

David:
i believe at one point i said publicly that i would 'never buy logitech products again'
David:
i guess i am a hypocrite ;P
David:
their hardware is decent enough, it's just that their software is terrible (however, fortunately unnecessary most of the time)
Patrick:
I think it'd technically be more a liar than a hypocrite
Friday, December 18, 2009

What Browser?

What Browser?

As an apparent follow-up to this survey, here’s a simple educational site from Google that you can point people towards if they don’t know what a web browser is.

I think the bigger issue is that most people don’t care. They can look at web pages - which is all they really want - whether or not they know what a web browser is.

Sunday, December 6, 2009

Google 'Personalized Search' is now on by default for everyone, even if they're not signed in

Google ‘Personalized Search’ is now on by default for everyone, even if they’re not signed in

The problem with this is that most people will not have any idea it is happening, let alone how to turn it off. I don’t think Google cares; they only care what will get more clicks.

Sunday, November 22, 2009

I had originally suggested using the Android logo and trademark (which they may or may not own) as a way of ensuring compatibility, but it seems the logo is creative commons [sic].

I had originally suggested using the Android logo and trademark (which they may or may not own) as a way of ensuring compatibility, but it seems the logo is creative commons [sic].

Russel Beattie

Sunday, October 11, 2009

apple remote from 1993 times change

Apple Remote from 1993

Times change…

Friday, September 11, 2009

… I want everybody here to be careful about what you post on Facebook, because in the YouTube age, whatever you do, it will be pulled up again later somewhere in your life.

… I want everybody here to be careful about what you post on Facebook, because in the YouTube age, whatever you do, it will be pulled up again later somewhere in your life.

Barack Obama, President of the United States

19 of 47