Saturday, October 8, 2011

Welcome

My first computer was an Apple //c. I was very young–we have home movies of me using it to print pictures of Sesame Street characters. I remember the feel of the keyboard. I remember the tiny Apple logo, a carefully-placed splash of colour, inset so precisely - that little logo, in particular, was an example of precision that seemed uncommon in other produced things. I remember tone of the beep and the rattle of the floppy drive when you turned it on. I remember examining every inch of the machine–from the drive latch, softly rubbery, which would flip inward and then up to open–to the handle that cleverly flipped down to serve as a stand–as if seeing where all of the lines and seams led would give me some kind of insight into how it worked. I don’t know if I could have described it at the time, but it left me with the impression of something that was designed.

I was born in August 1984, the same month that the Macintosh was introduced. But we didn’t have a Mac until much later: a Quadra 605, a ‘low-end’ machine, was our first. It was amazing.

I learned BASIC on the //c, then later, used Chipmunk Basic (which, incredibly, still exists!) on the Mac. I used ResEdit to hack Chipmunk’s resource fork to display the GUI in the way I wanted, and wrote text adventure games with graphics and sound. I hacked a few existing commercial games in this way, to customise them and to amuse my friends, and, well, just because I could.

In independent study, in middle school, I wrote a short, illustrated fictional book about a boy who discovers a special kind of modem in the woods behind his house, takes it home and plugs it into his Mac, and discovers he can use it to chat with extraterrestrials. The book included detailed screen shots.

I don’t still have most of these things, but I can tell stories about them, which is almost as good.

When I was working at my first job after college, at one point I was asked a question about a legacy system running on an old FileMaker database. I had no experience with FileMaker, but I took one look at it and said it was exactly like ClarisWorks, which I had used in the mid-90s to make an invoicing database for my mom’s home business. This caused a stir, considering my age. One of my coworkers, about the same age as me, remarked that she would have been climbing trees around that time. I remember this because it gave me pause, and I wondered if climbing trees might have been a better use of my time. But this is me, for better or for worse.

Of the useful knowledge I have in my adult life, I’ve learned a large part of it while using the Mac, self-directed, either through trial and experimentation, or through the Internet. I never particularly excelled in school, except in subjects I was already good at; I always found it easiest and most rewarding to learn on my own. In a very real and tangible way, Apple computers played a major role in teaching me how to learn.

It wasn’t until I received word of Steve Jobs’s death that I realised I had secretly hoped to meet him someday. (You know, ‘someday’, when I’m successful and important enough for that to be real.) It’s a strange and unfamiliar sensation, to suddenly discover something that you never admitted to yourself, and then immediately have it crushed.

A few days later, John Siracusa described it exactly (at 35:14):

For people who are celebrities–and he was kind of a celebrity–this happens more with actors and singers and stuff, but–you see all the interviews with them, you listen to all their music, you watch all their movies, you buy all their products, whatever it is. And you start to think, that you know the person, right? […] If you see your favourite celebrity, it can be like ‘I know everything about this person. I know their biography, I read their life story, I’ve seen a million interviews with them…’ It feels like they’re your friend. But they don’t know you because they’ve never seen you or met you. And so you have this weird desire to be like, ‘I know you so much, I bet we could be great friends if you only knew me’, which is almost certainly not the case.

[…]

So, I find myself with this inclination too, because when somebody dies, the people who are most affected by it are the people who personally knew him, and to a first approximation, nobody personally knew him, you know–it’s very small compared to the number of people who think they know Steve Jobs because they buy all these Apple products and have read all about him and stuff like that. So you find yourself wanting–wishing you had been personal friends with Steve Jobs. ‘Cause like, now he’s gone and now we can never be friends. Which is pretty irrational–because you were never going to be friends with him anyway, right? He can’t be friends with the whole world.

I saw some stories–even the people who did know him were all trying to see him before he died, and he was very particular about even the set of people he was, you know, going to talk to. He made choices that you would say ‘why would you make that–’ like one of the people who he talked to was [John Doerr], a venture capitalist for the early Apple, and I don’t know what the relationship was, but I can imagine like the reason that he might have talked with him was that, ‘back when I was starting Apple, I needed someone who believed in me, and who would give me money to do my thing, and this is the guy–this is the venture capitalist who believed in me.’ Right? That’s the guy who Steve Jobs wants to talk to, he doesn’t want to talk to his adoring fans who’ve bought–and not like he doesn’t like you or anything, but that feeling, that sense of loss, that ‘now I can never be friends with Steve Jobs’–makes no sense on a rational basis, but I think a lot of us feel it, simply because we felt like he either already was our friend, or could have been our friend, or we would have a lot to talk about, or–you know what I mean? That’s a weird feeling, and I think we’re all feeling it.

It’s still weird to me. It feels as though this isn’t the same world that it was a few days ago.

There’s one simple phrase that always stuck in my mind when I think about my experiences with the Mac. It used to be the first thing you saw when you turned one on: ‘Welcome to Macintosh’, accompanied by a smiley face. It seems to me that Steve and Apple’s primary mission was always to bring technology to as many people as possible, in the best way they knew how. And they have done.

It’s been a common theme among people I read in the past few days, that Steve didn’t predict the future, as some have said; rather, he decided what he thought the future should be, and then he made that future.

Apple welcomed us into that future, and now it belongs to all of us. And it’s up to us, now–not just the people working at Apple, but everyone who knows what ‘Apple-like’ means, and understands that ‘insanely great’ is more than just hyperbole–to continue making the future an exciting and welcoming place to live in. Steve started it, and now that he’s gone, we have to keep it going. I’m counting on all of you.

I’ll do my best, too. 

Wednesday, October 5, 2011

no title

Sunday, September 25, 2011

SwitchEasy Canvas case for iPad 2

SwitchEasy Canvas case for iPad 2

I only just recently got my first iPad1, and I decided I needed a case for it2. I tend to think these things through carefully, and I came up with these requirements:

  1. Protects the screen
  2. Protects the metal back
  3. Can be put in a bag
  4. Isn’t itself a bag
  5. Opens and closes like a book
  6. Turns the iPad on when opened, off when closed
  7. Can prop the iPad up at several different viewing angles
  8. Does not obstruct any ports/buttons/features
  9. Not made of leather
  10. Not cheap junk

I was very surprised at how difficult it was to find a case that meets all, or even most of these requirements.

Smart Cover

I first considered Apple’s own Smart Cover, because it’s a first-party accessory and Apple generally makes good stuff.

The Smart Cover fails #2, but whether that even needs to be a requirement is debatable. The iPad 2’s metal back is surprisingly scratch-resistant; not quite so much as a MacBook Pro or Air, but much more so than my iPod Touch. Still, it is an expensive device, and it just makes me cringe to think of setting it down on random counters and tables all the time. This is not a situation one encounters as frequently with an iPod or iPhone.

However, most of the reviews I recall reading of the Smart Cover indicate that it fails #3, in that it is likely to slip off of the iPad when jumbled around in a bag with other things, defeating the entire purpose of having one.

Further negative points against the Smart Cover included this review from Marco Arment, who is usually fairly thorough about these things, and the surprising inability for me to play with one at an Apple Store to see what they’re like.

Retail stuff

I looked around for a while at Target and Best Buy, but was surprised at how little there was to choose from. Many failed some combination of #7, #8 and #10, and every single one failed #6.

Best Buy also had as many, if not more, non-iPad tablet cases. I wonder how that’s working out for them.

Amazon stuff

At Amazon, I was dismayed to find seemingly dozens of nearly identical leather cases (which of course fails #9) from many different no-name brands, all bitterly throwing verbal attacks at each other in product descriptions and review responses.

I continue to not understand the prevalent obsession with leather - in any product, including (but not limited to) clothing, sofas and car seats. Aside from the discomfort it causes me to use a dead animal when synthetic materials would serve me just as well3, I just don’t like the slippery, mushy, destructible feel that it has. I don’t understand the appeal at all. Perhaps it’s one of those things that people do just to show off how much money they have (which is another thing I’ve never understood)? If so, there’s some kind of irony in all of these cheap, imported brands hawking them.

Many of them sort-of-passed #6, but there were often complaints relating to this in reviews: the magnets were either too weak and didn’t turn the iPad off reliably, or they were too strong and turned it off at the wrong times, like when the cover flap was folded back over the iPad.

Many of them failed #8 (particularly the often-forgotten microphone on the top). There were also frequent complaints about the leather fitting the iPad poorly and/or becoming deformed after continued use, causing various sporadic failures of #6, #7, #8. There were also frequent complains about ‘chemical smells’ as an apparent byproduct of the leather manufacturing process.

After many hours, I was not able to find a single case on Amazon that passed all of the requirements.

A short rant about keyboard-combination cases

The iPad is not a laptop. It’s not supposed to be a laptop. It does not replace a laptop.

If you keep it chained to a keyboard constantly, you are missing the point.

Finally, the SwitchEasy

I had almost given up when I finally found the SwitchEasy Canvas through this Quora question. It meets every requirement quite nicely. I almost didn’t find it on Amazon because of its severely lacking product page, but it’s there, inexplicably separated onto a separate page for every colour4.

My only complaints:

  • SwitchEasy is a completely forgettable brand name. I literally cannot remember it at all. I keep having to look it up every time I write or talk about it.
  • The way you slide the cover flap over at a weird angle in order to expose the rear camera is kind of awkward. However, I cannot see any other reasonable way to accomplish this with the portfolio-style design: the alternatives would be to either leave a hole in the front cover so it doesn’t completely cover the screen, or to block the rear camera completely. The way they did it was the best of few options.
  • I wish it had some kind of handle or strap on the outside.

Things I like about it:

  • Not leather! This is a personal preference, but the material feels durable and well-made, and looks very nice.
  • The iPad is held in place extremely securely by a plastic shell, which is mostly hidden by the synthetic-fabric cover which surrounds the entire thing.
  • Does not add an unreasonable amount of weight or bulk. Just the right amount of padding to make it feel protected against normal bumps (perhaps not a very high drop, but I’m careful with my stuff) but not too much padding to make it feel cumbersome.
  • Magnets work perfectly to turn the iPad on/off when opened/closed.
  • Clasp is secure and has a great tactile feel. I’ve read some complains about variances in the manufacturing process, but mine was perfect. I prefer this to only using magnets, which I would worry might allow it to flip open accidentally when jostled.
  • In what seems too much to be a coincidence, the product name is Cabel Sasser’s chosen name for the as-of-then unnamed original iPad.
  • Minimal branding imprinted on it.

All and all, I feel like this is the closest I could come to what it would be like if Apple itself tried to make a case that meets my requirements. I’m happy with it. (And, of course, the iPad itself, but that is another story.)


  1. Like an engineer, I kept trying to justify it with a use case, and couldn’t find one: I already had desktop and laptop Macs. Eventually, I realised: it’s just more fun, and that’s enough. ↩︎

  2. Unlike my iPod Touch, which has never had a case. My pocket is its case, and it does a fine job. The same will be true of my iPhone, when I eventually get one (when the service plans aren’t absurd). ↩︎

  3. Please understand: I enjoy a good hamburger whenever I can. I understand that this makes me somewhat of a hypocrite. ↩︎

  4. I got black, of course; or rather, I hoped I would, since the product page doesn’t actually say that anywhere. ↩︎

Friday, September 23, 2011

Kindle e-books now available to borrow from 11,000 US libraries

Kindle e-books now available to borrow from 11,000 US libraries

Fascinating. It appears that each library only has a limited number of ‘copies’ that they can lend at a time. It seems that demand may currently be higher than they had anticipated.

Here’s the Boston Public Library’s collection (library card required) and Amazon’s FAQ.

Monday, September 19, 2011

Netflix CEO on new branding for DVD service

Netflix CEO on new branding for DVD service

For the past five years, my greatest fear at Netflix has been that we wouldn’t make the leap from success in DVDs to success in streaming. Most companies that are great at something – like AOL dialup or Borders bookstores – do not become great at new things people want (streaming for us) because they are afraid to hurt their initial business. Eventually these companies realize their error of not focusing enough on the new thing, and then the company fights desperately and hopelessly to recover. Companies rarely die from moving too fast, and they frequently die from moving too slowly.

While this would seem obvious to most people, this kind of insight seems to be rare in any CEO.

… if you rate or review a movie on Qwikster, it doesn’t show up on Netflix, and vice-versa.

This seems like the worst part about the change. Even with separate web sites, why couldn’t they continue to share the same recommendations database? It’s one of the best things about Netflix, and something they’ve invested a lot in. For customers that subscribe to both, each service will suffer because of it - but more so, the service that the customer uses less, which Netflix seems to expect will be the DVD service.

To me, this really confirms–if anyone still harboured any hope otherwise–that they really do not care about the DVD business at all any more.

Tuesday, September 13, 2011

Second stick

David:
wtf nintendo
David:
3ds peripheral adds a second analog stick
David:
if they wanted that, it should have been built-in since the beginning
David:
it looks horrible and is powered separately
David:
what were they thinking?!
David:
now i feel like i have to wait in case they come out with a 3ds with a built-in second stick
Patrick:
yeah.
Patrick:
it's ridiiculous
David:
with three i's!
Patrick:
exactly
Patrick:
that's how ridiculous it is
Patrick:
3Is
David:
Nintendo 3IS: now with even more ridiiculous, and if you didn't think it was possible, an even worse name
Patrick:
yes
Patrick:
what do you call a pig with three eyes?
Patrick:
piiig
David:
heh
David:
well, this makes my decision easier, i guess
David:
i have too many games this fall/winter anyway, so i just won't get mario kart 3ds and super mario 3ds right away
Patrick:
yeah
David:
i'll wait till the inevitable 3DS redesign
Patrick:
was me plan from the start
Patrick:
really, 5 hours with everything set to minimum and no 3d?
David:
maybe it will have the second stick, maybe it won't, but there will be a redesign before too long for sure
David:
and if the redesign doesn't have a second stick, then i'll be reasonably reassured that it won't be a built-in feature
Patrick:
yup
David:
since it seems most probable that if they're ever going to do it, they'd do it sooner rather than later
David:
i just can't believe... a separate battery
David:
for a STICK
Patrick:
because the battery is so bad to begin with
Patrick:
although
David:
now you have *two* batteries to keep track of, and either one of them dying will result in you not being able to play your game (at least, not the way you want to)
Patrick:
yup
David:
i don't know what happened to nintendo
Patrick:
they rushed the 3DS out
Patrick:
it really wasn't ready
Patrick:
and no games for it
Patrick:
"must be out before new psp! and we has 3Dness! WE WILL PRINT MONEY AGAIN"
David:
maybe they're desperate, but that still doesn't explain the stick thing
Patrick:
rumor has it they were considering having a second analog stick intiially, but it wasn't ready yet
David:
at the very least, if they absolutely must have a second stick for some reason, save it until the redesign, so they're not making people like me nervous
David:
people would be pissed off if they bought the first 3ds, but it still seems less bad
Patrick:
thumbstylus
David:
it's $20, they can't be making much of a profit on that SKU
David:
and how was the second stick not ready initially
David:
were they not able to get this futuristic SECOND STICK TECHNOLOGY working properly in time?!
David:
in the future, perhaps all games will have a SECOND STICK!
Patrick:
heh
David:
maybe they can even come out with an addon for the wii! it would come with a coupon for a discount on a third arm so you can hold the wiimote and two nunchucks
Patrick:
yes
Patrick:
and a cup holder
Monday, September 12, 2011

Bananas and Cheese When I was too young to be dropped off at school so my mom could catch up on her soaps, she compromised with me by letting me catch up on my Mister Rogers’ Neighborhood for a half hour right before lunchtime. The venerable Fred Rogers played with puppets well into an age where he was eligible for AARP benefits, and also had a traffic light installed in his house. Needless to say, everything he told me should have been taken with a grain of salt, especially before lunchtime. One day, Mr. McFeely (“Speedy delivery!”) brought Fred a blank gray box from the neighborhood grocer, known to all of us as Chef Brockett. Inside that box was one banana, one slice of pre-wrapped American cheese, and a note reading “Wrap cheese around peeled banana and eat right away. Yours, C.B.” This being a happier time, Fred gave no second thought to the sparse instructions before enjoying his snack. I immediately told my mother to nix the scheduled peanut butter and jelly. There’s nothing special about this quick concoction (a “C.B.”—cheese banana, yes, but also Chef Brockett!), but it doesn’t taste half bad. I’ve tried it with Swiss and jack cheeses in addition to the classic American, and they all play nicely off the banana’s spongy texture and unique flavor. I’m sure there are health benefits galore, along with the added bonus of disgusted looks from your lunchtime companions.

Bananas and Cheese

When I was too young to be dropped off at school so my mom could catch up on her soaps, she compromised with me by letting me catch up on my Mister Rogers’ Neighborhood for a half hour right before lunchtime. The venerable Fred Rogers played with puppets well into an age where he was eligible for AARP benefits, and also had a traffic light installed in his house. Needless to say, everything he told me should have been taken with a grain of salt, especially before lunchtime.

One day, Mr. McFeely (“Speedy delivery!”) brought Fred a blank gray box from the neighborhood grocer, known to all of us as Chef Brockett. Inside that box was one banana, one slice of pre-wrapped American cheese, and a note reading “Wrap cheese around peeled banana and eat right away. Yours, C.B.” This being a happier time, Fred gave no second thought to the sparse instructions before enjoying his snack. I immediately told my mother to nix the scheduled peanut butter and jelly.

There’s nothing special about this quick concoction (a “C.B.”—cheese banana, yes, but also Chef Brockett!), but it doesn’t taste half bad. I’ve tried it with Swiss and jack cheeses in addition to the classic American, and they all play nicely off the banana’s spongy texture and unique flavor. I’m sure there are health benefits galore, along with the added bonus of disgusted looks from your lunchtime companions.

—Brian Sutorius, via McSweeney’s Internet Tendency

Thursday, September 8, 2011

Netflix for most devices runs on HTML & WebKit

Netflix for most devices runs on HTML & WebKit

Fascinating. They bundle their own version of WebKit, which then basically just connects to a special version of the Netflix web site for that device.

Thursday, September 1, 2011

No more Starz Play (whatever that is) on Netflix

No more Starz Play (whatever that is) on Netflix

This always seemed like a weird contractual hack to begin with: a small badge on the thumbnail, and a few-seconds clip of the Starz logo whenever one of these movies started playing. It’s very out of place in the Netflix experience.

It always seemed obvious to me that Netflix was doing the bare minimum to hold up its end of whatever cross-promotion deal it had with Starz. It wouldn’t surprise me if Starz had expected an entirely different implementation–or, perhaps, the executives at Starz, in classically clueless media executive form, simply thought something like ‘this Silly Internet Thing won’t go anywhere anyway’.

Now Starz is jealous of the (relatively) sudden surge in Netflix’s popularity, which must make the deal seem in retrospect like Netflix got a bargain. But what is Starz going to do now? Launch Starz Play as a separate, for-pay, web-based service, most likely limited to an extent so as to lure people back to the ‘real’, original service? Good luck with that. How many, like me, had never heard of Starz before signing up for Netflix, and would never consider subscribing to cable TV ever again? And let’s not forget that you can’t just appear on Apple TVs and Rokus and PS3s and Blu-ray players and John Siracusa’s toaster overnight.

As is becoming customary, I’ll pick on Gruber a little:

This is the problem with being a middleman.

It’s not exactly clear which of the two parties he means, but the implication seems to be one of:

  1. Netflix is behaving like a middleman, and made a poor decision in doing so.
  2. Starz is behaving like a middleman, and made a poor decision in doing so.

Given the context, the first seems more likely to be Gruber’s intent, but it makes the least sense. Netflix is delivering the service directly to the end user–interacting directly with the end user. That’s not at all like being a middleman.

Starz is, pretty much by definition, a middleman. They’re in the middle between the customers and the thing that the customers want, but they don’t directly provide anything to customers (in this context), and they don’t actually own anything of value. They’re only there to sign paperwork and move money around. But it’s not clear at all that this worked out poorly for them. If anything, the Netflix deal probably made very little difference to Starz, and the missed opportunity Starz bitterly hints at probably only exists in their imaginations. At the very least, they got some cash and some brand name recognition out of the deal. What would they have gotten if they had tried to make it on their own instead? Anything’s possible, but all you really need to answer that is to look at how many other old, bumbling media companies have tried and failed at that Silly Internet Thing in the past few years.

However, I agree with Gruber that middlemen are, in general, a problem. Technical people, as are his audience, abhor inefficiencies; and now that video is nothing more than bits on a wire, such entities need no longer exist, and only persist in putting their sticky hands all over everything because of their stubborn, selfish ways.

And yet, I’m not convinced that the original Starz deal was a mistake for Netflix. It served its purpose: it seems likely that, when it was originally signed, it might not have been merely expensive, but impossible for Netflix to obtain those titles by other means. In other words, the movie studios have been so afraid and so hesitant of this Scary Internet Thing that so-called (I apologise in advance) ‘high-value’ titles may have been unavailable at any price. This deal at least gave Netflix some, if not many, big-name titles that people could recognise and might draw them into the service. Of these, Netflix may have few today, but had many fewer a few years ago. But Netflix has persisted in pursuing deals directly with the studios since then, and the Starz deal may not be as necessary to their survival any more. Certainly, that’s the picture Netflix paints about the situation. Time will tell.

Oh, and one last thing:

When the agreement expires on February 28, 2012, Starz will cease to distribute its content on the Netflix streaming platform.

As a general rule of thumb, don’t trust anyone who describes what they’re selling as ‘content’.

Thursday, September 1, 2011

ive been reading some analysis and disbelief as

I’ve been reading some analysis and disbelief as to how and why Microsoft would make a design like this for Explorer.

But I haven’t yet read what seems like the most obvious explanation: they felt they needed to do something; the Ribbon seems to have worked before, in Office 2007; so they repeated what they did before, with the Ribbon.

This is what business people do: they repeat what worked before, and expect it to work again. And again. Forever. When that stops working, they either retire on a big pile of money, or find someone else’s idea to leech off of and repeat.

It’s hard and risky to create something new. Who wants that?

12 of 47